\u201cConsider thinking of architectural decisions as investments and take into account the associated rate of return, it is a useful approach for finding out how pragmatic or fit for purpose every option on the table is,\u201d remarks Richard Monson-Haefel in his 97 Things Every Software Architect Should Know.<\/p>\n
Monson-Haefel\u2019s views are important for building sustainable software lies in its architectural foundation. A well-designed software architecture is the cornerstone of the long-term productivity of a software system. It guides development team members with a roadmap, handles any possible vulnerability, and assists in iterative development.<\/p>\n
In today\u2019s time when software works on distributed systems and has to offer automation functionalities, the evolving considerations in the architecture design process must be given due care. To work against these requirements, optimize the development process, and build a scalable system, you need to arm yourself with software architecting best practices.<\/p>\n
The best practices discussed below might look similar but they are distinct in nature. You cannot turn a blind eye to any of them when designing a software architecture.<\/p>\n
As with any architectural choice, its adoption should be driven by specific project requirements and trade-offs, which is where the need to assess functional and non-functional requirements arises.<\/p>\n
Functional requirements dictate what the system should do, encompass features and capabilities, and guide the design and development process. It makes the software align with business objectives and end-user needs. Non-functional requirements, on the other hand, encompass qualities like performance, scalability, security, and maintainability.<\/p>\n
A balanced consideration of both types while designing the architecture equips software to not only deliver desired functionalities but also meet critical performance benchmarks. So, effectively you align your design and development efforts with the broader business objectives.<\/p>\n
The significance of Zero Trust Architecture lies in its ability to significantly enhance security in modern, distributed computing environments. Traditional perimeter-based security models are no longer sufficient in a landscape where cloud services, mobile devices, and remote work are commonplace.<\/p>\n
With the Zero Trust, even if attackers gain access to one part of the system, they need authentication and authorization to access other sensitive resources. Complement it with Zone segmentation, where each security zone has its own security controls and access policies.<\/p>\n
As a first step, start by breaking down a software project into discrete, independent modules or components, each responsible for a specific functionality or feature. Architectural patterns, such as the Model-View-Controller (MVC) or Microservices, often serve as blueprints for implementing modular architectures. We\u2019ll delve into Microservices in detail, later, in a separate section. These patterns guide the arrangement and interaction within the software design.<\/p>\n
By compartmentalizing functionality, developers can work on different modules simultaneously, which is important to improve parallelism and speed up development. Next, modularity replaces or upgrades individual modules without disrupting the entire system, promoting agility and adaptability, crucial in dynamic software environments.<\/p>\n
Software development emphasizes the importance of avoiding unnecessary complexity in the design of a software system. The principle is crucial for various reasons. Firstly, it enables better collaboration within the software development team, as simpler designs are easier to understand and maintain. Additionally, it enhances scalability, allowing the system to handle increased loads without major reengineering.<\/p>\n
A simple architecture also helps in smoother deployment, reducing the likelihood of errors or performance issues. It aligns with agile methodology and enables faster iterations and quicker responses to changing requirements. Complex architectures, on the other hand, can lead to confusion, slow down development, and increase risks.<\/p>\n
As a fundamental best practice, the principle of separation of concerns is a fundamental best practice in the designing of software architecture. For organizing a system into distinct and independent components, you need to make use of this specific aspect of functionality. By following this principle, you can build a maintainable, clear, and understandable structure for the software.<\/p>\n
By separating concerns, developers isolate different functionalities, such as user interface, business logic, and data storage, reducing interdependencies between them. Different teams can work on separate concerns simultaneously which aids in parallel development.<\/p>\n
Here is an example of how sticking to this principle assists. In a web application, separating concerns would involve distinct layers like the presentation layer for user interface, the business logic layer for handling application-specific tasks, and the data access layer for interacting with databases. This way, changes in one concern have minimal impact on the others, promoting flexibility and scalability.<\/p>\n
The way a software architecture influences performance parameters dictates the long-term efficiency of the software it rests upon. As a result, the following parameters must be given careful thought while designing software architecture:<\/p>\n
Performance Parameter<\/strong><\/td>\n| Description<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | Processing Speed<\/td>\n | Optimization of algorithms and code execution to minimize processing time for tasks and operations.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | Memory Utilization<\/td>\n | Efficient management of memory resources, including allocation, deallocation, and minimizing leaks.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | Network Latency<\/td>\n | Minimizing the time it takes for data to travel between components, involving communication protocols.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | Concurrency and Parallelism<\/td>\n | Handling multiple tasks or processes concurrently, making use of available resources like multi-core processors.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | Throughput<\/td>\n | Number of transactions or operations a system can handle within a given time frame.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | Response Time<\/td>\n | Time taken for the system to respond to a request, a crucial metric for user-facing applications.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | Availability and Reliability<\/td>\n | Ensuring that the system remains accessible and dependable, often measured by metrics like uptime and MTBF.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | Fault Tolerance and Resilience<\/td>\n | Designing the architecture to gracefully handle failures and recover from errors without causing disruption.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | Load Balancing<\/td>\n | Distributing workloads evenly across multiple servers or components to prevent overloading.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | Caching<\/td>\n | Utilizing mechanisms to store frequently accessed data or computations, reducing the need for repeated processing.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | Optimized Data Structures and Algorithms<\/td>\n | Choosing appropriate data structures and algorithms for specific tasks to improve computational efficiency.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n | <\/p>\n Benchmark the system under various loads to identify potential bottlenecks and inefficiencies, and record the performance against these parameters. Through these steps, you will anticipate future growth and make the system accommodative.<\/p>\n Be cautious of scope creep<\/strong><\/h3>\nAs we mentioned in the preceding part, a microservice architecture lets you break your application into independently deployable services. Each service is responsible for a specific business capability and communicates with others via APIs or messaging protocols.<\/p>\n Due to this capability, Microservices offer several benefits as the architecture<\/p>\n
|